> See also: > - Reference # philosophy stuff fair can be defined (man-made concept) and doesn't exist on its own (in "nature") 1) broad scope - utilitarian? (optimized for maximum happiness even if not uniform <- "betterment of society as a whole") - equilibrium? (100% uniform across the population) HHH "equilibrium" style of fairness isn't feasible as everybody has different requirements (which make them unique) 2) personal basis - (influenced by environments/upbringing/personality) - "I don't think that's fair" - cultural, medical, personal - more complicated definitions of fair ("adjusting sliders" vs "") omniscience (a third party controlling all comparisons/trades) vs "lack of information" perspective from first person perspective move around each person's beliefs/faith - other ways to explore beliefs rather than continuing towards radicalization - viewing impact on individual person vs society misinformation <-> viral loads - what if they have complex reasons for focusing on said misinformation ( “yeah but thats not fair to the people 100 years ago” common information → allows us to familiarize ourself with atypical beliefs Books: mountain behind mountains